Tuesday, April 30, 2002
Monday, April 29, 2002
Sunday, April 28, 2002
Say What?
Public Release: 14-Mar-2002 ET New book challenges theories of black speech A new book by two North Carolina State University linguists challenges a half-century of sociolinguistic theory and takes a fresh look at the history of the controversial and highly visible ethnic English dialect Ebonics, also known as African-American Vernacular English (AAVE). National Science Foundation, William Contact: Dr. Walt Wolfram wolfram@social.chass.ncsu.edu 919-515-4151 North Carolina State UniversityFriday, April 26, 2002
Thursday, April 25, 2002
Warez = 10 Yearz jail
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2108386,00.html And then a clever person said: Have you ever used napster or any of the next gen file sharing programs such as gnutella / morpheus / kazaa? If so you might want to reconsider your opinion unless you consider 6.75 years in the clink appropriate. (See the article "dealing in infringing copies of copyright material" -- would that make running kazaa fall under this draconian and retrogressive legislation?) The other problem apart from appropriateness of response is that many consider copyright is due for an overhaul. You've got to wonder when a significant proportion of the online population ignore a law whether it is time to revisit the value of the law to society. The law is a victimless crime, that the law exists is absolutely purely societal convention. By way of example of the sheer scale: kazaa (which uses the fast track network protocols) typically has 1.5 million users simultaneously online, sharing 1.5 Petabytes (that's 1000 terabytes) and I'd guess a fair proportion of that content is copyrighted works for which the copyright owner or authorized distributed has given no explicit or implicit approval for the distribution of the works. The MPAA, RIAA and SPA are essentially powerful special interest lobbying organizations attempting to bias the legal systems of the world to enhance and defend their bottom line in a world which has seen the advent of essentially the same order of sweeping change in the Internet as the printing press on book copying. I personally don't think DMCA for example is at all in the public interest. I don't think the continued increasing of copyright term in the US and elsewhere is in the public interest. The RIAA in particular isn't even very fair to the artists who's rights it may claim when it suits are what it is defending. Personally I think we'd be in a better world if copyright where simply scrapped. An argument for copyright is typically that it is necessary to protect the interests of individual artists -- writers, musicians etc. however the current reality is that it has been perverted into a tool of the mega-corporations monopolistic content-cartels to extract price gauging rents for content whilst paying a negligible fraction to the original authors. The latest trends of outlawing circumventing copy controls (DMCA) are quite evil and stifling of progress. In the US the current battle is over proposals to outlaw sale of general purpose computers without digital copyprotection mechanisms extending right out to peripherals -- encryption to the monitors, and speakers, copy-protection encryption in the hard disk firm ware. The trend of erosion of previous copyright exemptions such as fair use quotation and so on is further evidence of the expansionary and monopolistic rent seeking behaviour of the media cartels and their powerful lobbying groups.Home Sweet Global Monopoly
Starbucks make us feel ill. With their carfully chosen subtle (but not too bland) colour scheme. They try to suggest some kind of ethnic liberal charm. Even the background music has been Starbucked, watered down instrumental versions of Hendrix for example, after all we wouldn't want to offend. The quirky living room sofa's and tables which are not so quirky when you realise they are identical to the other thousand of stores. And those thousands of stores, like a plague infesting our highstreets, a McDonalds for the new media generation. virtually every street corner will soon contain that incipid nippleless mermaid. Their attempts at portraying a modern arty cafe culture, with left leanings are just a caked on makeup, for the neo liberal global capitalist thug that they are. Destroying land with their farming methods and lives with their wages to farmers and workers alike. Most of all we dislike their vermin like spread, subsidising new stores in order to out price and close down local rivals, before turning entire towns and cities that horrid green. Blanding out any local culture or diversity and helping every high street look the same worldwide. Yes, but which one amongst you can make a decent cappucino? The fact of the matter is, people like good coffee, and the british suck at making coffee. When they go into a cofee joint, they ask for "coffee". Amongst europeans, they are the most ignorant eaters. Anyone living here knows this. You go into a traditional english "caf" and what you are given when you ask for coffee (and that is your *only choice*) is a filthy mug filled with hot dishwater and a weak solution made from Kenco granules, topped off with some sour milk. Oh, and did I mention that the place itself is dirty from top to bottom and corner to corner? And then they drink it. The more "sophisticated" places that have that miracle of science, the Gaggia, are almost always operated by an ignoramus that thinks that coffee is something you get in a dirty cup in a caf. She burns the milk, and presents you with something even more revolting than dishwater, because it is a thing pretending to be a thing; an imitation. The fact of the matter is, Starbucks, Coffee Republic and Cafe Nero are clean places with comfortable chairs, where you can get a reliable and consistent cup of coffee. No where else in Britain can do this, unless you find a small specialist chain like Maison Blank or some other very small place that is run by either a French or Italian person, even then, its a gamble. What do we notice about these coffee chains? Firstly, there are many of them. On every streetcorner, sometimes three to a street. That this is disturbing is unquestionable. People love their streets, and hate to see them vandalized by bland chains. The other thing that we see is that they are always full of people drinking coffee and eating cakes, smoking fags and sitting around reading free newspapers. This coffee house culture, which is a simulation and direct descendent of places like Marge in Montreal, is something that is old and which works. The coffee chains have simply standardised it and imported it. The normal argument that is insertedhere, is that if people didnt want these places, they would not be spreading so wildly. I would say something else. People do not know what they want. If you give them something nice, they will eat it, sit in it and drink it. It can be you that provides it, or someone else. Pulling stunts in front of these shops does nothing, except satisfy the performers. No one is fed. No suffereing workers are paid extra money. No land is spared. The coffee trade is notorius for its bad practices, and for years there have been ethical companies trading coffee fairly with growers all over the world. These are the people who are doing something real. Clearly, there is a place for an ethical coffee house. But should there be just one, or should there be one in every high street, so that the ethical coffee house owners can exert more influence on coffee drinkers and bean buyers? If you were to try and furninsh hundreds of new, ethical coffee houses, would you buy your furniture one piece at a time, or would you cut a deal with a sofa maker to furnish them all cheaply whilst maintaining the quality of the furninshings? You could say that each one could be made as a work of art, individually designed, furnished and decorated, so that your shops dont visually pollute the streets they sit in. Ok, do it. At the end of the day, people are now exposed to and hooked on coffee that IS COFFEE (compared to the dishwater that they used to think was coffee). They will not go back to that dishwater served in filthy grease holes. If you want to do something about coffee chains, something REAL, then the standard that you have to beat has been set. The gauntlet has been laid down. Put up or shut up. OR, concentrate on making cool flash games and submitting them to Newgrounds.com and stop wasting bits on this pointless self satisfying stunt performing. Join a circus. Open a coffee bar. Whatever you do... BE REAL. It has to be said, that Situationist propaganda, is totally useful high art of the most noble kind. That sign, "this way to escape", is priceless, pregnant with true meaning and a boon to "society". If these people do this, and the other lame shit, they can be totally forgiven, and contrary to the psycholgy of Accounting whcih has permeated everything, the two actions are not two sides of an equation cancelling each other out, the result being zero. The one is outside of the spectacle, and therefore does not have a spectacular value. Its value is infinite and zero simultaneously because it is REAL.Wednesday, April 24, 2002
Special Report: Linux is making headway in corporate datacenters, so why not the PC desktop? Conventional wisdom says Linux lacks business productivity apps. Here are four examples to change your mind.
April 17, 2002 | Tech Update Special Report
More foreign banks switching to Linux
New Zealand's TSB Bank is the latest big company to switch to Linux, and the ranks are swelling. According to IBM, 15 banks in central London alone are running Linux clusters.
April 22, 2002 | By Matt Loney
On Friday, the Apache Software Foundation endorsed version 2.0 for real-world "production" use, not just for test machines. Apache Software Foundation Director Greg Stein designated version 2.0.35 as the first general availability--or final--version, and now recommends it over the earlier 1.3 versions
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-878511.html
In Houston, local hip-hop acts thrive. You can find "screwed" music in any record store -- "screwed" being a slowed down, draggy version of the original song. And in many of these songs, if you listen closely to the lyrics, you'll hear references to "drank", "lean" or "Barr" -- all nicknames for codeine cough syrup, a drug of choice for many in the hip-hop community. They mix it with soda or juice, add some ice and sip it to get high. Guest host Melissa Block has the story. (12:30)
Tuesday, April 23, 2002
Davros Said
"re 5 live, just been listening to that. They sound like average live talk radio hosts - thinking on their feet and trying to present a programme about something they aren't 100% ready for. All sorts of phone-in shows and other talk formats like that are (in the UK at least) pretty bumbling and often a little condescending, because all these people are suddenly thrown together to talk about something, whilst watching the clock on the studio wall and trying to stay in character as mr or ms personality. I thought it was a good interview/piece though, and finally I have a voice for all those irdial discs postings (as well as Simon Mason's webpages if you listen to the other articles on there). Alex, glad you liked the N. I'm labouring most evenings on it and the other works, and I'll be posting details of the exhibition they will be in when the time is more appropriate." that post got eaten whist trying to put in a missing quote mark...Me Say
and as for the presenters, they had WEEKS to think about this; the time constraint really is the main factor, that show is just superficial pep/coke/speed radio. People like it, they have millions of listeners. Radio 4 goes in deep long and hard, rather like BLOGDIAL when its at its best :] The posters for "Attack of The Clones" have gone up in London by the way. I saw (by accident) a few seconds of the preview, and it looks awesome.Apple Macintosh:
Hypnotically encased iMacs trick unsuspecting computer users into accepting Darwinism
|
However, these propagandists aren't just targeting the young. Take for example Apple Computers, makers of the popular Macintosh line of computers. The real operating system hiding under the newest version of the Macintosh operating system (MacOS X) is called... Darwin! That's right, new Macs are based on Darwinism! While they currently don't advertise this fact to consumers, it is well known among the computer elite, who are mostly Atheists and Pagans. Furthermore, the Darwin OS is released under an "Open Source" license, which is just another name for Communism. They try to hide all of this under a facade of shiny, "lickable" buttons, but the truth has finally come out: Apple Computers promote Godless Darwinism and Communism.
But is this really such a shock? Lets look for a moment at Apple Computers. Founded by long haired hippies, this company has consistently supported 60's counter-cultural "values". But there are even darker undertones to this company than most are aware of. Consider the name of the company and its logo: an apple with a bite taken out of it. This is clearly a reference to the Fall, when Adam and Eve were tempted with an apple2 by the serpent. It is now Apple Computers offering us temptation, thereby aligning themselves with the forces of darkness3.
This company is well known for its cult-like following. It isn't much of a stretch to say that it is a cult. Consider co-founder and leader Steve Jobs' constant exhortation through advertising (i.e. mind control) that its followers should "think different". We have to ask ourselves: "think different than whom or what?" The disturbing answer is that they want us to think different than our Christian upbringing, to reject all the values that we have been taught and to heed not the message of the Lord Jesus Christ!
Given the now obvious anti-Christian and cultish nature of Apple Computers, is it any wonder that they have decided to base their newest operating system on Darwinism? This just reaffirms the position that Darwinism is an inherently anti-Christian philosophy spread through propaganda and subliminal trickery, not a science as its brainwashed followers would have us believe.
ADDENDUM: It has been brought to my attention that the Darwin OS mentioned above now has a cartoon mascot (no doubt to influence children) named Hexley (pictured above) -- a platypus dressed as a devil who performs occult magic, i.e. hexes. They're not doing a very good job keeping their ties to the forces of darkness a secret, are they?
Monday, April 22, 2002
Le Pen
You simply cannot keep hammering people and expect them not to react. You cannot block the streets of France to pray, and expect people not to hate you. You cannot hold the world to ransom over land and expect generation after generation to let you get away with it. People turn to the Right as a reaction not as a first choice. Everyone has to BEHAVE. Go home, do your job, mind your children, have you hobby and BE QUIET; this is all that life is about my friends. This turn to the Right in France is not unexpected. The same thing happened in Austria. This evil euro currency that more than half the people dont want, combined with the unrepresentative and anti-democratic European Parliament is enough to make any decent person vote for the far right. The stifiling and insane political correctness that keeps everyones mouths shut is simply intolerable to decent people. The right are the only ones who offer a way out of all of this, if only in words, and that is enough to get the votes. Look at Italy, and the two million people who hit the streets to protest the new revisions to the workers rights laws. Berlusconi said afterward "we are going to go ahead with the new laws despite the protests". What do you expect people to do, lie down and take it? Maybe now in France Mitterand will be a little less cavalier; probably not. Either way, dont bother being worried about a swing to the right, because it has been made to happen and is not an indication of a new class of hating people suddenly emerging from nowhere.Its hilariously funny; people give the most incredible answers using wordplay that is to die for. email me if you want the channel name!
Sunday, April 21, 2002
Saturday, April 20, 2002
Friday, April 19, 2002
Thursday, April 18, 2002
Wednesday, April 17, 2002
Tuesday, April 16, 2002
Monday, April 15, 2002
In '95 before dreamweaver was even a dream, I used to write HTML by hand. Now, I simply wait for someone to get thier act together so that it (css) can be done on the fly. Sadly I don't have time anymore to become completely fluent in everything that I would like; I'm concentrating on mastering Perl, CSS is on the list.
Ideally, the next iteration of Dreamweaver will have some switches in it that allow you to make everything out of css; your positioning, borders, font control...everything, on the fly. Quark 5 tries to do this, but fails miserably. You cannot even import your old *.qxd and turn it into HTML.s
Its possible to have a complex site that renders identically in both Mozilla and IE; it takes time to do it...is it worth the effort? certainly its satisfying on a personal level...its late Dragonball Z becons!
http://www.homoexcelsior.com/omega.db/datum/on-line_culture/pr0n/3985
AFAIK this definition is wrong, and the term came about because IRC ops not wanting porn to be discussed in channel set up kick bots to remove any users that mentioned the banned subject, like "trade", "porn", "games", $banned_word.
If you had pr0n on your machine, (or MP3s for that matter) would you keep it (them) littered all over your disc, or keep it in one place?
biatch!
you rally know how to take someone's (usually mine) and make them seem stupid...
anyone thats seen your stuff (and you know we all have) KNOWS you are not stupid, and actually quite talented.
massive generalisation. Flamage: The hobby of the lower classes!
>>macos is actually bad for users, because it discourages >>thinking.
>how and why? ok, so it's not the best os ever, but like >windows is?
Actually, this is a more serious philosophical question; should we encourage people in education to think less about how things work?
Certainly, this would create a population of computer illiterates, and in a world that is pervasively infested with computers and thier interfaces, this cannot be a good thing.
AOL is a bad thing, and is similar in its aims as the early Macos was; take away the learning about the system so that you can just get stuff done. Well, thats fine if your tools are only ever used to make paintings, but now these tools are being used for *everything* including the most important aspects of our lives, like privacy, banking health security and....toasting!
We need a population of computer literate people, who know the difference between "saving it in adobe photoshop" and "saved the .tif file in my pr0n folder".
These computer illiterates are the people who propagate viruses because they cannot change between mail clients....schools should aim to REDUCE the numbers of these people, not add to them by de-educating them on macs.
This is why the idea of macs in schools was so strange. now of course, Macs in schools is a no brainer. Every shchoolboy and schoolgirl should be weaned on MACOS. Those that have the ability will become power users that can use any UNIX. Those that need simply to paint can do that to, all on one platform.
Its a miracle.
The results show that 98.3% of Web users can experience Macromedia Flash content without having to download and install a player.
and yet, no one doing anything related to money is doing anything with flash, despite the fact that you can do many backend/database related tasks with it. The ones that tried, died (boo). I'm not sure what that says...it will probably take one instance of a hit website running totally on flash to change everything.
i'm just saying it has a place,
yes: http://www.newgrounds.com :]
give me some content and we'll see...
SURELY you are going to go 100% WC3 with FC??
take a look at this:
100% WC3HTML4.0 If its good enough for D.O.MILLER it's good enough for you!
he hasnt demonized design, he is throwing a bright light on bad web design. design on the web, depending on the purpose of the site, needs to function differently than print for it to be usable. flash is frowned upon because it is not a web standard, and for the most part, it is used in a way that gets between the user and information. Some flash designers are using it to decorate pages as if they were print in motion.
i'm all for function over form, without it design becomes mere decoration, useless and superfluous, but at the same time,
in the case of the web, we have several factors or pressures that should dictate how you design your website. bandwidth, platform are the key constraints that control what you can do if you want to be sucessful. normally, flash designers dont care about any constraints, thinking that if it works on their machines (normally macs) that its OK. usabilitys first rule is to take other peoples experience into account, and in order to satisfy this, you have to constrain yourself, and restrict your use of stuff that excludes people. this does not mean that you have to give up beauty, art, innovation, design or anything else. if anything, it means that the talented will shine brighter. look at this 100% standards compiant page, which is rich, usable and not at all gray background and blue links http://www.opera.com there are many others of course.
who said the function has to be so easy, surely a challange is what we're all after,
How about this for a challenge, design a website that is visible by everyone, loads fast for slow modem users, is navigable and validates as correct W3C HTML, without any compromise in aesthetics. That brief is a REAL challenge.
The newest trend in flash sites is the "OS in OS". In fact, these sites have simply folded the now disparaged flash intro into the navigation. every time you go to these sites, you see the menu elements being built, boxes appearing from nowhere like an os booting...its a total waste of bandwidth, adding nothing to the information, and in fact, getting in the way of the information.
yes of course an easy, intuitive UI is one of the goals of any OS, which makes Mac OS so good to use, not only is it a joy to use, but it is beautiful as well.
What nielsen is talking about is the usability of websites, not OSes. some would argue that the macos is actually bad for users, because it discourages thinking. with OSX this argument is dead, because OSX can be whatever you want it to be, thanks to it sitting on UNIX. of course, you could argue that Mac saw the light of day, and dumped the original Macos because it was a piece of crap, opting for a complete re-write....but i digress.
To paraphrase William Morris, one should not own anything that is not beautiful and useful. usability on the web is awesome as well, to meet a website that is not only beautiful to look at but also a joy to navigate is something that is sadly rare, and something i strive for in my designs, when it is called for.
and that is all that jacob is asking people to do; make it usable, make it visible to even the 14k modem user on a 14" monitor. if you want to convey something, convey it, and dont let superfluous boxes, faux OS elements and other nonsense get in the way. of course, no one is saying that you shouldnt do any of these things; just dont say that your sites are useful.
so yes, i agree with neilson becuase 'usuability' or function as it's more commonly known (what a spin doctor, making new trendy catchphrases for things that have existed for centuries) is important.
these things need to be said. standards need to be written and spread. this is the only way that the web can continue to be useful. anyone using filesharing apps knows that having 4 different networks Gnutella, Fast, WinMX, OpenNap, does no one any good. if all of these were using one standard filesharing protocol the benefits to everyone are clear. its the same with web-browsing. anything that fragments the web is bad. flash fragments the web into people with flash and people without, so, it is bad. incompatible browsers fragment the web. thats why the W3C is so important, and why Mozilla and Opera are so important, and why IE, with its proprietary extensions is so evil.
before form takes place function must be accounted for. like making UML diagrams or planning out how the website will work on hundreds of scraps of paper first like i have been doing for the FatCat redesign. but it doesn't mean we have to resort to such draconian undesign totalitarianism that he calls for.
If one is trying to sell something on the web, we have some examples to see what happens when we try different approaches. If the site is based on Flash, it will fail. See Boo.com. See Now.com. If its is standards compliant, everyone will be able to use it, and it will have a better chance of suceeding. If its hosted on IIS, it will be hacked. If it is running on NetBSD, there is less of a chance that it will be hacked.
that doesn't mean all design has to be yucky flying colours and flashing bits everywhere... to paraphrase someone else who was quoted in "die neu typographie" by jan tschiold, design is complete when you've got rid of everything you don't need.
Yes indeed everything you dont need i.e. FLASH.
Ohhhhh Mama!!! that one is going into my holster!
as for praystation.com crippling barrie's mac. this is due to macromedia and the crappy implementation of the flash player under mac os. makes my life a misery, it really does. read eric natzke's rant about it... although that's a flash site and will probably cripple your mac as well.. :(
Macromedia, as great as they are, own flash. as long as it is owned by them, and they refuse to relinquish it so that it can become a true, open standard, we really shouldnt rely on it for anything other than fun.
and i was always for nintendo... nes, gameboy, snes. missed out on the n64, and then i got a dreamcast. what happened to me?
I NEED a gamecube! Paper Mario just got finished in my house...its a very beautiful game indeed...I still havent played Majora's Mask...
i thought about why i like programming too. it's about solving problems. like design. solving problems. mix them together and i am very happy.
a deadly cocktail that gets you drunk with no hangover.
how cool is THAT??!!
Sunday, April 14, 2002
What's Your Flavor?
Yum! You're mocha. Intense, rich, and a little complex, you're as tasty as they come. Find out more about your personal flavor � sign up with Emode! http://www.emode.com/Saturday, April 13, 2002
well...imagine that you work for a newspaper, and your editor asks you to write an article about solving the problem of litter in the city. You write your article, it gets column inches on the front page, and the next day the streets are still filthy.
With software, you can write your article, using almost natural language, and the streets would be clean as soon as you publish the text; thats what software is. It allows you to write essays that have an actual effect on the world around you, the effects and results of which are real action.
Also, there is no interpretation of your meaning with software. What you write is explicitly and precisely executed; there is no chance of misunderstanding of what you meant to happen. There is exactness, purity, cleanliness.
To anyone that can write english, this is exiting.
no eyes glazed over, which was odd
Friday, April 12, 2002
Thursday, April 11, 2002
Wednesday, April 10, 2002
Tuesday, April 09, 2002
Congratulations! You are the most evil man of all time! Not only did you exterminate millions of Jews and involved the world in the biggest war the world has ever seen, you also convinced the Germans that the perfect human is a tall blue eyed blond when you're a short, dark Austrian yourself! Well done you spiteful little shit!
What tin-pot dictator are you? Take the "What Dictator am I?" test at PoisonedMinds.com
|
Insane!
I had a long session of emails with someone who found us via a random link at Yahoo (wold you believe). I will summarise what went on. This person believes that:50 years ago, government contractors developed anti gravity devices. For 50 years, these contractors and the US govt. has kept this new technology a secret, and that they, in conjunction, have been flying thousands of sorties over populated areas, in very large numbers of differently configured craft, some of these craft being hundreds of feet in length. Some of these sorties being over (for example) New York City, where the craft hovered over the ground at 100 feet.
and that the US military:
Flies secret aircraft over heavily populated areas. Buzz people with secret aircraft. Interfere with and disable vehicles with secret craft. Flies secret aircraft in the paths of civilain aircraft. Flies secret aircraft over the airports of cities in foreign countries.
and that:
United States Scientists are more able to produce good science than other countries, hence, other countries have not yet discovered anti gravity, and are not using it to test anti gravity aircraft.
and that:
eyewitness testimony and the evidence of military and civilain pilots, police men, lawyers, doctors and people fit for jury duty are insufficnent for any purpose.
and that:
The NASA explanation of the Project Blue Book sightings is intellectually sound and satisfying, to a critical and logical person.
and that:
The best explanation for the UFO phenomenon (the excellent radar / visual sightings that are irrefutable and corroborated) is that they are all secret military aircraft, and that the Wallonia triangle was a propellor powered deridgible.
Now, is this not the most INSANE nonsense that you have ever heard???
Just doing a reality check :]
You REALLY need to read this to start the argument from the right place.
You should already know about this: http://www.primenet.com/~lippard/stupid-skeptic-tricks.txt
Project Blue Book Unknowns are at: http://www.ibmpcug.co.uk/~irdial/bluebook.htm
Wallonia Triangle is at: http://www.ibmpcug.co.uk/~irdial/triangle_1.htm
This is also interesting: http://www.rense.com/general18/newwave.htm
PS whle you are at it, on and off for a year now, I have been trying to get a hold of the authors of this site (Brian Zeiler and Jean van Gemert): http://www.primenet.com/~bdzeiler/index.html
if anyone here could find one of them, it would be *rather* useful. Thier website was excellent, and we would lke to mirror it here.
Monday, April 08, 2002
There was / is a bass player that did all of the excellent live bass playing, his name was / is Perez .
For me, it is the bass and the flawless mixing that makes their music priceless. That bass playing, which flows, that does not repeat itself, which is live, an improvised line of pure dance bass....
It is to DIE for!
If a tree falls down in the woods and no one is there to hear it, does it make a noise?
Oops, sorry, being a DUMBASS!
You may or may not have heard these, but they all GEL HARD. because of the esteemed membership of this place, its almost impossible to come up with a list of things that I think you might not have heard. Hows that for an excuse!!
all Deutche Gramophon recordings (pre digital)
all King Tubby Productions
all Lee Perry Black Ark recordings from the "Soul Fire" era
The Hafler Trio "Masterbatorium"
A Certain Ratio, "Sextet", "Kether Hot Knives" 12"
all Bootsy Collins Rubber Band solo work (pre digital)
most Parliament / Funkadelic, especially "The Motor Booty Affair"
almost all bollywood music productions
Kraftwerk: Computerworld (EXTREME GEL) [but you know this!]
Thelonius Sphere Monk (and ALL Teo Macero Productions)
All Creed Taylor Productions
all early Adrian Sherwood On-U Sound Productions
All Jeff Lynne Productions, including the digital ones. (!)
Nathan Van Cleef's electronic works
Wendy Carlos's TRON soundtrack
Lalo Shifrins 70's soundtracks
Sunday, April 07, 2002
M�nchen (dpa) - Mysteri�se Lichterscheinungen am Himmel �ber Bayern haben am sp�ten Abend f�r Aufregung gesorgt. Der Schwerpunkt der r�tselhaften Lichtblitze war S�dbayern. Allein bei den Beh�rden in Garmisch-Partenkirchen gingen rund 50 Anrufe ein. Experten sind sich aber noch uneins �ber die Deutung des mysteri�sen Ph�nomens. So vermutete der Deutsche Wetterdienst in Offenbach, es habe sich um einen Kometen gehandelt. Ein Mannheimer Ufo-Experte ging von einem �Feuerball-Boliden� aus.
If you place a file called mozilla.bmp in the same directory as mozilla.exe in windows, this file will be used. A splash screen is usually not a part of a theme, because you can't have more than one splash screen installed (Mozilla doesn't know installed themes at lauch, where it has to load the splash).
If you want to change the splash screen on linux you gotta build rpm source, go to mozillla/xpfe/bootstrap and change splash.xpm If it fails to compile open splash.xpm with an editor and check if the header is splash[ ] instead of splash_xpm[ ]. If not change and save it, recompile.
http://www.lotekk.net/index.php?page=moz=splash