Monday, May 30, 2005
Smuggled letters from Tariq Aziz, political prisoner
Sunday, May 29, 2005
Downing Street Memo; irrelevant
"Despite the memo’s disturbing and explosive revelations, there has been a virtual media blackout with some newspapers deliberately turning a blind eye to the Downing Street memo. Contact the media and ask them to do their job in reporting and investigating the information in the memo. Write a letter to the editor, call in to radio shows. It's time for the media to address real news." http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/takeaction.htmlAnd here is the fatal flaw of all campaigners against the war and corruption/conspiracy in western government. They still believe like the most naïve of children, that the public can be motivated by the media, and that somehow, scandal still matters. Everyone should now understand completely that scandal, being caught out in a blantant lie, mass murder - none of these things, when exposed to the public via the media, can bring a polititian or government down. The only way to stop the warmongering, mass murdering, criminal, immoral governments is to take a true action against them. 'Taking action' does not mean getting the media to report that a lie has been told; even if the media did report it widely, a single report, dozens of reports, would have no conssequences. A true action entails a cutting off of the means to wage war and to govern. It means mass non cooperation with any illigitimate government. It means refusing to finance government until you get the government that you require, i.e., one that uses your money only for shools, hospitals, road maintenance and everything else you want and nothing that you don't want (war). Anyone who calls for demonstrations, petitions, pleas to the media and any other 20th century style action is a part of the problem. Only one type of action is left, one last weapon; a cutting off of the sole reason why your enemies do what they do - money.
Saturday, May 28, 2005
Friday, May 27, 2005
One Chip to Rule them All
27 May 2005
The United States wants Britain's proposed identity cards to have the same microchip and technology as the ones used on American documents.
The aim of getting the same microchip is to ensure compatability in screening terrorist suspects. But it will also mean that information contained in the British cards can be accessed across the Atlantic.
Michael Chertoff, the newly appointed US Secretary for Homeland Security, has already had talks with the Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, and the Transport Secretary, Alistair Darling, to discuss the matter.
Mr Chertoff said yesterday that it was vital to seek compatibility, holding up the example of the "video war" of 25 years ago, when VHS and Betamax were in fierce competition to win the status of industry standard for video recording systems.
"I certainly hope we have the same chip... It would be very bad if we all invested huge amounts of money in biometric systems and they didn't work with each other.Hopefully, we are not going to do VHS and Betamax with our chips. I was one of the ones who bought Betamax, and that's now in the garbage," he said. [...]
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=641731
Of course, if there is one manufacturer, thats another 60 million sheep to be sheard on a decanual basis. I presume that the manufacturer of the us system is in the usa...either way, they are gunning for the one manufacturer over all others. Imagine it; that momentum could mean that there is one company making these chips world wide for BILLIONS of sheep.
That is a wet dream beyond wet dreams, the very definition of a licence to print money.
And of course, you will already be aware that Northrop Grumman got the contract for the UK Police IDENT1 system, so there is a precedent for the usa having access to UK citizens data. YES, criminals in the uk are still UK citizens. Whats that you say? Northrop would not back door the system so that CIA would be denied access? YOU FOOL!!!!
Sun is for fun
Thursday, May 26, 2005
What did you expect?
Here comes that phrase again
Exclusive from:
Thu May 19, 3:00 AM ET |
Dan Tynan
Are you who you say you are? Answering that question may soon involve more than simply handing over your ID. You may also need to hand over part of your personal biology by submitting to a biometric scan.
Voice, face, and eye scanners have been a staple of Hollywood science fiction for years. Now they're rapidly becoming a part of everyday life, as the spike in identity theft and fears over terrorism have created a biometrics boom.
Today, facial recognition is used in airports to identify potential terrorists and at casinos to finger card sharks. Schools use fingerprint and hand scanners to restrict access to employees and students. Iris scanners help secure border checkpoints and nuclear power plants, while banks are starting to use voice prints to verify transactions made over the phone.
A company called Food Service Solutions sells fingerprint-scanning systems to K-12 schools around the United States. The schools mainly use the systems in cafeterias to speed kids through lines by linking them to a personal cash account that pays for their lunches. Reviews have been mixed on whether lines have gotten shorter.
Grocery stores have also begun experimenting with fingerprint scans to hurry shoppers on their way and protect debit accounts from illegal use.
But what's the potential downside? Privacy watchers say that as biometric scanners become more widespread, it becomes possible for organizations--companies, the government--to create a detailed dossier of your physical movements as you pass from one scanner to the next. If Starbucks can easily track your movements, so can Uncle Sam, or your insurance company, or your spouse's divorce attorney, and so on. [...]
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
I must be blunt
Meau is correct and eloquent on ID proposals
Computer illiterates and total morons
Time's Up
The Crypto Wars are Over: Let the ID Wars Begin!
Release time: 00.01, 25th May 2005 The Crypto Wars Are Over! The "crypto wars" are finally over - and we've won! On 25th May 2005, Part I of the Electronic Communications Act 2000 will be torn out of the statute book and shredded, finally removing the risk of the UK Government taking powers to regulate companies selling encryption services. The crypto wars started in the 1970s when the US government started treating cryptographic algorithms and software as munitions and interfering with university research in cryptography. In the early 1990s, the Clinton administration tried to get industry to adopt the Clipper chip - an encryption chip for which the government had a back-door key. When this failed, they tried to introduce key escrow - a policy that all encryption systems should leave a spare key with a `trusted third party' that would hand the key over to the FBI on demand. They tried to crack down on encryption products that did not contain key escrow. When software developer Phil Zimmermann developed PGP, a free mass-market encryption product for emails and files, the US government even started to prosecute him, because someone had exported his software from the USA without government permission. In its dying days, John Major's Conservative Government proposed draconian controls in the UK too. Any provider of encryption services would have to be licensed and encryption keys would have to be placed in escrow just in case the Government wanted to read your email. New Labour opposed crypto controls in opposition, which got them a lot of support from the IT and civil liberties communities. They changed their minds, though, after they came to power in May 1997 and the US government lobbied them. However, encryption was rapidly becoming an important technology for commercial use of the Internet - and the new industry was deeply opposed to any bureaucracy which prevented them from innovating and imposed unnecessary costs. So was the banking industry, which worried about threats to payment systems from corrupt officials. In 1998, the Foundation for Information Policy Research was established by cryptographers, lawyers, academics and civil liberty groups, with industry support, and helped campaign for digital freedoms. In the autumn of 1999, Tony Blair finally conceded that controls would be counterproductive. But the intelligence agencies remained nervous about his decision, and in the May 2000 Electronic Communications Act the Home Office left in a vestigial power to create a registration regime for encryption services. That power was subject to a five year "sunset clause", whose clock finally runs out on 25th May 2005. Ross Anderson, chair of the Foundation of Information Policy Research (FIPR) and a key campaigner against government control of encryption commented, "We told government at the time that there was no real conflict between privacy and security. On the encryption issue, time has proved us right. The same applies to many other issues too - so long as lawmakers take the trouble to understand a technology before they regulate it." Phil Zimmermann, a FIPR Advisory Council member and the man whose role in developing PGP was crucial to winning the crypto wars in the USA commented, "It's nice to see the last remnant of the crypto wars in Great Britain finally laid to rest, and I feel good about our win. Now we must focus on the other erosions of privacy in the post-9/11 world." Press release - Foundation for Information Policy research <www.fipr.org>Now, let the ID Wars begin, and this time there is no way we can let them rage on for years as we loose troops to registration. Registration is the battle ground in the ID wars. To be a soldier in this war, you must not register. You must recruit your friends and family so that they do not register. The enemy gains territory as people register; people and their data are the battleground. Right now, we have the high ground, because registration has not even begun. In the board gaming sense we are already in the winning position. By incremental registration, we will slowly loose this war. Every individual's resistance to registration is a battleground. You do understand this, right?
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
RealID Rebellion Part 2
Late last week, the U.S. House of Representatives quickly approved an $82 billion appropriations bill to fund America's military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan. This bill is headed to the Senate in the next few days, and President Bush has indicated his strong support.
Tucked inside this massive funding package are some of the most sweeping - and, many have said, harshest - changes to immigration law in years. Representative James Sensenbrenner (R - Wis), the Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, is the primary sponsor of this legislation, which is known as the "REAL ID" Act.
The most high-profile provision of REAL ID would mandate that applicants for state drivers' licenses must prove they are in the U.S. legally, in order to get identification that may be used at federal facilities (airports, national parks, government offices, and so on.).
However, REAL ID is much broader than that. It will fundamentally reshape the U.S.'s policies governing the admittance and removal of foreigners from our country. And this change, in turn, will alter the way the rest of the world thinks about the United States.
Despite the extensive debate around REAL ID over the past several months, one vital fact has surprisingly been overlooked: Many provisions of the legislation violate treaties that are part of U.S. law. Others insult well-established international norms, including norms the U.S. itself helped develop; often, they betray Eleanor Roosevelt's great legacy.
In the end, this aspect of the Act may be its biggest flaw. It also, as I will argue, may undermine the Act's very justification - by making America less, rather than more, secure. [...]
Real ID Resistance
perfectly usable for all conventional CC purposes after the chip is treated with a hammer.Best idea yet. In related news, here is something on the RealIDRebellion: "Sunni Maravillosa has created a blog to coordinate resistance to the Real ID Act. Stop by, read the comments and links, add your site to the list of "REAL ID Rebels." http://realidrebellion.blogspot.com/ There's nothing about my property in a car that ought to require me to pay some extortionist a license. And the RealID can't steal my freedom if I burn it, or never apply for it. Several jurisdictions in North America are considering offering driver "license" type documents for those who wish to have identity papers without being "RealID'd". Regards, Jim http://indomitus.net/ _______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
Several jurisdictions in North America are considering offering driver "license" type documents for those who wish to have identity papers without being "RealID'd".State delivered ID systems with unique identifiers and the associated legislation forcing you to carry them and register for them are the problem. If these states create 'ID that are not RealID'd' they will still be 'offering' systems that can be harvested and integrated into the larger federal system. Let me spell it out for you. The goals of the anti RealID campaign should be as follows:
- The permanent forbidding of ID cards in the USA
- Permanent removal of all legislation requiring persons to identify themselvs with state ID for any purpose.
- Permanent and stringent restrictions on the aggregating of personal identifiers and data by the state and any other entity.
- Permanent enshrining of the right to travel without documents and the right to refuse to identify yourself .
Monday, May 23, 2005
Bittorrent Search Engine
Star Wars and the American Empire
Star Wars and the American Empire |
by Scott Horton |
[Spoiler warning: This article gives away important details about the new movie.] "For a thousand generations, the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic. Before the Dark Times. Before the Empire." – Ben Kenobi "This is how liberty dies: with thundering applause." – Senator Padme Amidala Many of us grew up on Star Wars, and some of us, as 10-year-olds on rainy Saturday afternoons, even spent time trying to piece together the story before the story. What were the Clone Wars? How did the Old Republic become the Empire? How could the emperor have defeated what were presumably thousands of Jedi and taken over the galaxy? Now we know the answer: Deception. Just like in the real world. Before the movie was even released, people began making the connection between the war on terror and Vader's declaration near the end of Revenge of the Sith, "You are either with me – or you are my enemy." Lucas, however, when asked if this was a reference to the War on Terror, said at the Cannes film festival, "When I wrote it, [the current war in] Iraq didn't exist. We were just funding Saddam Hussein, giving him weapons of mass destruction; we didn't think of him as an enemy at that point. We were going after Iran, using [Saddam] as our surrogate – just as we were doing in Vietnam. This really came out of the Vietnam era – and the parallels between what we did in Vietnam and what we're doing in Iraq now are unbelievable." [...] |
Sunday, May 22, 2005
General greivous and The Galactic Empire
Musical Baton
Musical Baton
Magnetbox passed me the Musical Baton. Normally I don't answer stuff like this, but I am a viral addict, and the geometric explosion of a theme (or do I mean meme?) is just too tempting to not be a part of. And since it came from Magnetbox, it must therefore be cool. Strangely enough, I rushed to read the pass the baton email thinking that Magnetbox was giving up running his manly and utterly superb RIAA Radar site, which would be a disaster of sorts. I was wrong, thankfully, and look what I got instead!
Total volume of music on my computer 11,063 songs, taking up 55.67GB of an internal hard drive. This is 833 artists according to iTunes, spread over a possible 35.8 days of continuous listening. And I've pruned it down.
The last CD I bought Bruce Gilbert's 'Ordier'. And I bought two copies.
Song playing right now Now playing: 'Oxygene 3', by Jeanne-Michel Jarre.
Five songs I listen to a lot, or that mean a lot to me Marin Marais Charley Patton Bruce Gilbert Forqueray Miles Davis
These are five artists that I listen to alot, snarfed from my audioscrobbler prifile. Yes, prifile. I listen to alot of music, and love alot of it. It's pointless to be pinned down to a small list - better to embrace it all and swim in it. How could I possibly pick a single Davis cut to enter into that list? I will say that I have recently been listening to 'Sugar Ray' and everything else from the 'Jack Johnson' sessions. Wow. Anyone who doesn't like Modern Miles is just a fool. Marais and Forqueray (and to a similiar extent Couperin) hit it with me so perfectly that it is almost like the music is a part of my very soul.
Bruce Gilbert is simply the greatest ever sculptor of sound.
Charley Patton..."I'm gonna buy me a Banty; put i'm in my back yawd". Priceless.
Five people to whom I'm passing the baton I'm passing it on to people who love music and who I know run or contribute to some sort of regularly updated site, or who can pass this baton on to someone who does. That means Alex_t, Mary 13, Meau2, Alun Kirby, and Cardiffteam.
Saturday, May 21, 2005
Revenge of the Sith
Friday, May 20, 2005
"are who they say they are"
City workers first to get hi-tech ID cards By Sam Lyon, Evening Standard
Britain's first hi-tech identity cards are being issued to London workers today, the Evening Standard can reveal.
The cards, containing details of credit history, criminal records and immigration status, are being introduced to combat identity theft and illegal working.
Hundreds of staff at City banks, blue chip companies and government departments are being issued with them. Thousands more are expected to follow.
But critics condemned the scheme, which is being administered by a private-sector company, as an "unprecedented invasion of people's privacy".
Phil Booth, national coordinator of the No 2 ID campaign, said: "This is very worrying. Soon there will be no aspect of our lives which isn't sucked into the identity system."
The cards are linked to a database containing personal details gathered during a vetting process and held by private investigators Crocker Stolten. Unique identifiers such as fingerprints can also be added.
Former fraud squad officer Lionel Stolten, the man behind the London Identicheck scheme, said: "Companies need to know who is entering their buildings and that those people really are who they say they are, especially major corporations which hold sensitive information."
Most of the cards are being issued to foreign nationals, who work as contract cleaners, restaurant and mailroom staff.
Workers at Birkin Cleaning Services, whose cl ients include the Home Office and the Ministry of Defence, and MailSource UK, whose clients include Barclays, Shell, Deutsche Bank, the BBC and Channel 4, will be among the first to receive the cards.
There is already growing controversy over government plans to introduce national ID cards from 2008, to combat identity theft, organised crime and terrorism, and help stamp out benefit fraud.
The cards, which are not expected to become compulsory before 2012, will carry either fingerprints or an eye scan.
But Mr Stolten said: "I doubt the Government's plan for ID cards will include thorough searches of people's identity. It would take an army of staff."
Figures issued by Equifax, a credit rating firm leading the fight against ID fraud, suggest 31 per cent of Londoners have already been a victim.
External affairs director Neil Munroe said: "Companies are increasingly looking at more checks on people they employ. It protects the organisation."
So, workers who will have access to sites with sensitive data, have to hand over their sensitive data to make sure that they dont tamper with sensitive data, and of course, their sensitive data will be added to the sensitive data they are going to be allowed acces to. It's totally InSaNe. It would be much better not to keep sensitive data all in one place, in plaintext. In this way, people impersonating cleaners will not be able to go in and copy anything. For decades banks and all institutions have done without ID cards and everything worked very well - this is a false problem created by 'security' vendors, and everyone is being whipped up into a frenzy to adopt this nonsense. Whenever you hear someone advocating it their diatribes include the phrase, "are who they say they are". Keep an ear/eye out for it. If you want to keep a building from letting in people who are not authorized, you don't need to roll out an ID card that holds all sorts of personal data linked to a central database. You vet the person you want to hire, and then once that person is accepted, if you REALLY want to, you can have a finger print system that is totally internal to your facility; in other words, a bespoke system that doesnt involve cards or access to any external system. You guarantee your employees that the system is only internal to the company, and that your fingerprint will NEVER be released to any third party for ANY reason, and then you have a barely acceptable access control system. The vendor above is totally over the top, feature creeped-out and does nothing to really protect a building or a system. They collect and hold data just because they can and thats never a reason to violate someones stuff. Any of those workers can be compromised after they are vetted; this if the fatal flaw and reason why you cannot put a great deal of trust in these systems. Who ysay you are and being able to prove it doesn't give any indication of what your intentions will be in the future.
Test Chips and Torx Tools
Thursday, May 19, 2005
Evil DVD Rental System in Development
To Refuse: No2IDs last stand
Dear friends, I'm writing to you now as the Government prepares to steamroller its "Identity Cards" Bill through Parliament. Each one of you can do something immediately that will help in the fight against this unnecessary, oppressive and invasive legislation. Even the polls which the Government portray as indicating 'overwhelming support' for ID cards clearly indicate that there are 3 to 4 million people in Britain who are strongly opposed to ID cards. What I would like you to do now is quite simple. Get as many of these people (and others) as you can to sign NO2ID's petition before the Second Reading of the Bill in early June. When we tried this last year, we were hundreds strong and thousands signed in two weeks - now we are ten thousands strong our impact should be that much greater. Two ways to go about this are: 1) Promote the petition on your website, blog, lists or (best of all) by e-mail to people you know - please do not spam! A personal request to just five friends or colleagues will take just a few minutes. The online petition is at http://www.no2id-petition.net/. 2) Attached to this mail is a PDF copy of our petition, a downloadable version is available at http://www.no2id.net/downloads/forms/NO2ID%20Petition.pdf. Print it out and collect as many names and addresses as you can - some supporters have already sent in dozens gathered from their work, college, church or pub in just a few hours. The address to send completed sheets to is on the bottom of the page. Don't worry if you can't fill a sheet, send us what you have got. Thank you for helping us. Please act now. Phil Booth National Coordinator, NO2ID www.no2id.net
Matters Beyond BT’s Reasonable Control
11 Matters Beyond BT’s Reasonable Control Sometimes BT may be unable to do what it has agreed because of something beyond its reasonable control. If this happens BT is not liable to the Customer.It appears that 'The Phone Disc' is alive and kicking. The lines above are from the terms and conditions. Here are the details:
BT Phone DiscTM Single User version |
| ||||||
The Phone DiscTM Single User version contains approximately 15.5 million telephone number listings across the whole of the UK (including those from other Licenced Operators and the Channel Islands).** Ideal as a source of number information, this CD offers 3 search categories, "people", "business" and "all" using sophisticated interactive searching techniques. A range of other very useful features include: | ||||||
| ||||||
The data | ||||||
The Phone DiscTM Single User version contains a national data download from the BT Directory Solutions OSIS database. New versions are produced every quarter and can be searched for 12 months following each release. Phone Disc is activated with search credits following installation, either via a dedicated website or through calling our BT Customer Support Team | ||||||
Car Crash Coming
Personal Data for the Taking
enator Ted Stevens wanted to know just how much the Internet had turned private lives into open books. So the senator, a Republican from Alaska and the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, instructed his staff to steal his identity.
"I regret to say they were successful," the senator reported at a hearing he held last week on data theft.
His staff, Mr. Stevens reported, had come back not just with digital breadcrumbs on the senator, but also with insights on his daughter's rental property and some of the comings and goings of his son, a student in California. "For $65 they were told they could get my Social Security number," he said.
That would not surprise 41 graduate students in a computer security course at Johns Hopkins University. With less money than that, they became mini-data-brokers themselves over the last semester.
They proved what privacy advocates have been saying for years and what Senator Stevens recently learned: all it takes to obtain reams of personal data is Internet access, a few dollars and some spare time.
Working with a strict requirement to use only legal, public sources of information, groups of three to four students set out to vacuum up not just tidbits on citizens of Baltimore, but whole databases: death records, property tax information, campaign donations, occupational license registries. They then cleaned and linked the databases they had collected, making it possible to enter a single name and generate multiple layers of information on individuals. Each group could spend no more than $50.
Although big data brokers can buy the databases they crave - from local governments as well as credit agencies, retail outlets and other sources that students would not have access to - the exercise replicated, on a small scale, the methods of such companies.
They include ChoicePoint and LexisNexis, which have been called before Congress to explain, after thieves stole consumer data from their troves, just what it is they do and whether government oversight is in order. And as concerns over data security mount, inherent conflicts between convenient access to public records and a desire for personal privacy are beginning to show. [...]
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/18/technology/18data.html?pagewanted=print&position=
Finally some journalist has caught up withh the tip of this iceberg.
Many years ago, there was a disc you could buy that contained all the BT telephone records. Called 'The Phone Disc' you could do forbidden 'reverse lookups' with it. It was the same data and programme used by Directory Inquiries.
Now. I guarantee you that there are DVDRs floating around with linked datasets of the american population, including SSNs and data from every available public record source and all the 'stolen' Choice Point and Lexis Nexis datasets. These DVDRs are changing hands for thousands of dollars now, but it won't be long before an ISO is available on USENET.
The point we need to understand is this; the UK, being still largely paper based for all of its important records should not go down the american road, which leads only to a spectacularly fatal car crash. It must not deploy a centralized database, because such a treasure trove will be copied and sold to people. The agents of HMG are constantly loosing laptops full of secret information; all it will take is someone to loose a tower or laptop containing a mirror of the complete database, or someone to retrieve an improperly sanitized hard drive from a garbage skip and then the pandoras box is open. Forever.
The computer illiteracy of the legislators elected by 22% of the electorate is no excuse for such an ill thought out idea to be adopted here. This legislation must be rejected outright, if not, then you can fasten your seatbelts all you like, you will be ground up in that car crash if you give in and register.
As for the public services you use, its long past the time to change the name of the billed person on all your accounts....right?
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
http://creativearchive.bbc.co.uk/
Standards Slipping
The reports of the Galloway Senate clash
"Here was an opportunity to demonstrate his cussedness and vanity on a genuinely global scale. Mr Galloway seized the limelight with both hands, proclaiming his own innocence before moving on to a full-blown recitation of the anti-war gospel according to St George."I saw nothing vain about the way The RT Hon gentleman from Bethnal green conducted himself; I found it to be calm, reassured, measured and polite. As for 'cussedness' there is nothing stubborn about going into a kangaroo court and defending yourself against lies that have been told about you. This is a word carefully used to subtly mischaracterize and besmirch a man who has done nothing but say what he thinks. Astonishing.
"No wonder the senators began to look a little embarrassed at this ranting apparition in their midst."I put it to you that they looked embarrassed because they had been catastrophically caught out as puppets and simple minded country bumpkins, without evidence or morality.
"It was an unequal battle. Senator Coleman had Mr Galloway’s name on a list: but Mr Galloway had something more, the gift of the Glasgow gab, a love of the stage and an inexhaustible fund of self-belief."And....? The fact that these idiots had nothing on him. They had no evidence, and what they managed to have cobbled together for them was already in the public domain and totally discredited. This is what the right Hon. member had on his side, he was on the side of right, he knew it and he ran with it, and rightly so. The Times cant stand this. Shame on them. The Guardian said:
Then it was the Respect party leader's turn and any sense of judicial propriety was instantly shattered. The courtroom became a vaudeville theatre, as the MP lampooned his interrogators, accusing them of making "schoolboy howler" mistakes.Vaudville? Lets make absolutely sure: Vaudville:
- Stage entertainment offering a variety of short acts such as slapstick turns, song-and-dance routines, and juggling performances.
- A theatrical performance of this kind; a variety show.
- A light comic play that often includes songs, pantomime, and dances.
- A popular, often satirical song.
"...Even so, it was a REMARKABLE and compelling performance. Crooks And Liars has an incredible video of the spectacle of Galloway ripping into U.S Iraq policy aiming his remarks at Norm Coleman. Two things on this. (1) This writer has supported the war, but reads and watches everything he can on the subject. (We realize that some on the left and right consider that treason — to read and watch everything you can — so we plead guilty on that.) (2) Galloway's statement is powerful stuff, delivered with no-holds-barred language and he seemingly makes the case that he has been correct on lots of things and HE is not having to backtrack with spinners trying to justify his earlier position... It doesn't matter if you support or oppose the war...this is must viewing (and Crooks And Liars as usual does a great job with giving you a hefty piece of high quality video). Watch it yourself." http://www.themoderatevoice.com/posts/1116388846.shtmlThis is how the Guardian piece should have read, if it were written honestly. It would have linked to the footage, and frankly, been honest in reporting what happened. Its rather stupid not to do this, since everyone can go and double check their reporting with six or seven clicks. That last link turns up in a Google News search, alongside links to traditional news sources; it really is Game Over for trying to spin these stories. But you know this!
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
George Galloway Slices Senators To Pieces
Letters...
Monday, May 16, 2005
chomskytorrents.org
Friday, May 13, 2005
They have no idea what they are facing; a REAL person!
The central allegations first surfaced in the Daily Telegraph in April 2003 when the paper claimed that Mr Galloway had personally profited from Iraqi oil deals. He sued for libel and last December won a resounding victory in the high court with £150,000 in damages.
A few days after the Telegraph's reports, another paper, the Christian Science Monitor, alleged it had documents to show that Mr Galloway had received $10m from the regime over 11 years. It, too, had to apologise and pay damages when the documents were shown to be forgeries.
The senate committee appears to have mixed up these two events.
A spokesman for the Telegraph said: "The committee appears to be confusing our documents with a set of alleged receipts that emerged in Baghdad some days after our story appeared. These purported to record direct payments to Mr Galloway in the early 1990s. They were offered to the Daily Telegraph but, as they were clearly crude forgeries, we declined to publish them."
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1483166,00.html
!!! These moronic senators cannot even use Google. Galloway is going to swat them like bugs, and if they can be sued for libel, I am sure that he will persue it and prevail. Again.
No need for balance The media and political elite now regards George Galloway as beyond the pale. So the normal rules of the game don't apply
I come not to praise George Galloway but - unlike almost the entire media - not to bury him either. There will be many who snort contemptuously when I say that Galloway is now more sinned against than sinning because he has become so unpopular with both the media and political elites that they regard him as outside the normal rules of the game.Is brown beyond the pale? ???!!! Looks like it!!!!!! Haw haw haw!Indeed, to defend him places the defender beyond the pale too. But the victim of what has all the hallmarks of a media feeding frenzy deserves a fair hearing, not only for his personal benefit, but for those he now represents - and in order to confront journalists with their own misguided agendas.
In quick succession since his election victory last week in Bethnal Green and Bow, Galloway has been subjected to a television mauling by Jeremy Paxman, a radio sandbagging by the MP he defeated and a raft of newspaper headlines about a set of reheated allegations which he has not only strenuously denied but which ended with him winning a major libel action.In spite of Galloway's court victory and the accumulated evidence in his favour, the BBC saw fit to lead its news bulletins yesterday with the story of supposedly "new" accusations that he received money from Saddam Hussein's Iraq through its oil-for-food programme. Yet the only difference between the claims made against Galloway by the Daily Telegraph in April 2003 and a US Senate subcommittee this week was that they were based on (already published) documents allegedly retrieved from Iraq's oil ministry rather than its foreign ministry - and not, as wrongly claimed, that they covered different periods.
In all other essentials, the allegations made by the Senate committee are the same as those originally outlined in the Telegraph articles that resulted in Galloway being awarded £150,000 in libel damages and £1.2m in costs, though an appeal against the high court ruling in his favour is still outstanding.
[...]
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,9115,1483078,00.html
Thursday, May 12, 2005
The Revolution Begins...
National ID Battle Continues By Kim Zetter 02:00 AM May. 12, 2005 PT Legislation supporting a standardized national driver's license may have won unanimous approval in the Senate on Tuesday, but the bill's apparently smooth passage left some jagged edges in its wake. The Real ID Act appeared in take-it-or-leave-it spending legislation, which effectively forced lawmakers to sign on to the whole measure even if they disagreed with a portion of it. Several Republican and Democrat senators who cast favorable votes for the bill simultaneously railed against the provision authorizing the new driver's license rules. They're not the only ones refusing to accept the bill peacefully. The National Governors Association is threatening lawsuits to fight the legislation. And some states are threatening to ignore the legislation because they say it will cost up to $700 million for states to comply and will place a heavy burden on Department of Motor Vehicles workers. A spokeswoman for the governors' association did not return calls for comment. But Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, a Republican, told the Associated Press this week[1] that "if more than half of the governors agree we're not going down without a fight on this, Congress will have to consider changing" the rules. In the meantime, mobilization against the legislation is also occurring on the citizen front. Civil liberties activist Bill Scannell, who launched a website[2] this week to protest the legislation, said that visitors to his site sent more than 20,000 faxes to senators within 24 hours. "One by one (senators) got up and said, 'This is a real stinker but you've got a gun to our heads so we've got to vote for it,'" Scannell said. "This is an incredibly sleazy way to push something that pushes the very nature and foundations of our democracy." The act passed in the Senate with a 100-0 vote Tuesday and passed through the House twice -- first as a stand-alone bill in February and again last week as part of a larger spending bill. But several senators, such as Lamar Alexander (R-Tennessee) and Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), said the legislation would have unintended consequences and likely wouldn't improve national security. Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said more than 600 organizations -- including state legislation associations, civil liberties groups and pro-immigrant advocates -- opposed the bill. And he said organizers will gather next week to discuss plans to press Congress to revisit its decision. "This is one of the biggest mistakes Congress has ever made," Rotenberg said. "This is not over by any means." Supporters of the bill say it would prevent terrorists and undocumented immigrants from obtaining legitimate documents that would help them move freely through the country. Last year, the 9/11 Commission called for tightening control over government-issued IDs because 18 of the 19 hijackers in the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks used U.S. IDs to pass through airport security. But opponents of the bill say it would create a national ID card and a de facto national database -- a concept that Congress rejected when it was first proposed several years ago. The act would force states to produce standardized, tamper-resistant driver's licenses that would include machine-readable, encoded data. States wouldn't be required to comply. But those that don't comply would create hardship for residents, who wouldn't be able to use their licenses as official identification to travel on airplanes, collect federal benefits or gain access to federal buildings. All drivers, including current license holders, would have to provide multiple documents to verify their identity before they could obtain a license or renew one. Drivers would have to provide several types of documentation, such as a photo ID, birth certificate, proof that their Social Security number is legitimate and something that verifies the applicant's full home address. Some critics call the legislation anti-immigration because it would prohibit undocumented immigrants from obtaining a driver's license. The law would compel DMV workers to verify the documents against federal databases and store the documents and a digital photo of the card holder in a database. Critics say the mandates would result in higher costs and longer lines at the DMV. "It's a controversial measure and a controversial manner in which to pass it," Rotenberg said. "We want them to know that in passing (the Real ID Act), Congress mandated the collection of sensitive personal information by state DMVs at the same time that the state DMVs have become the target of attacks." Since March, there have been at least three reported incidents of personal data being stolen for the sake of identity theft from DMV offices in Nevada, Florida and Maryland. Senators opposing the act[3] reluctantly passed it because it was slipped into a larger spending appropriations bill[4] that authorized emergency funding for the Iraq war and tsunami victim relief. Last month, 12 lawmakers -- six Republicans and six Democrats -- called on Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tennessee) to prevent the ID bill from being slipped into other must-pass legislation. They asked Frist to refer the bill separately to the Senate Judiciary Committee, where it could receive a hearing and debate. "Legislation in such a complex area without the benefit of hearings and expert testimony is a dubious exercise and one that subverts the Senate's deliberative process," the senators wrote in a letter to Frist. Among the senators who signed the letter were Alexander, Durbin, John McCain (R-Arizona), Chuck Hagel (R-Nebraska), John Sununu (R-New Hampshire), Edward Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) and Richard Lugar (R-Indiana). Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin) wrote the Real ID Act and tried unsuccessfully to slip it into different must-pass legislation last year. But many lawmakers objected, which forced Sensenbrenner to try again this year. Rotenberg said groups didn't mobilize strongly before the bill passed this week because they were hoping and expecting the Senate would keep the bill separate from other legislation to give it a proper hearing. Once it became clear last week that the Senate was not going to do this, there was little time to mobilize. Jeff Lungren, spokesman for the House Judiciary Committee, which Sensenbrenner chairs, acknowledges that the bill wasn't debated on its own in the Senate, but he says the legislation was discussed extensively last year when Sensenbrenner first proposed placing it in another bill. "We had plenty of debate," he said. "It started in September; it was in various committees of Congress. It was in the (9/11 bill) that the House passed (last October). It was the main bone of contention ... last year. It was also very much in the headlines in the news everywhere last November.... If some members (of Congress) chose not to deal with it (then) that's their fault." Lungren said that senators told Sensenbrenner last year to put the provisions in a separate bill so they could consider the proposals. "So we did that," Lungren said. "Nobody should be surprised or whine about lack of debate on these provisions." Rotenberg disagrees. "There were no hearings on the bill in the Congress, just a lot of procedural maneuvering," he said. "And how can he say that they agreed to allow the Senate to consider the bill separately when that is exactly what they prevented during the conference (where proponents pushed to have the bill inserted into the spending bill)?" As for the idea that states might choose not to comply with the legislation, Lungren said they would "probably have some feedback from their residents if (residents) can't use their driver's license as a form of identification. But that's their call to make and we're hopeful they'll work with us to improve the security standards (of their cards)." Lungren said the main standard put forth by the legislation regards verifying that people obtaining a state ID card are legally present in the state. He said 41 states currently have such requirements that meet the Real ID Act standard. "It's the ... other states that have low standards," Lungren said. "Because of those low standards they put all Americans at risk." President Bush is expected to sign the Iraq spending appropriations bill this week. © Copyright 2005, Lycos, Inc. All Rights Reserved. [1] http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,67490,00.html [2] http://www.unrealid.com/index.html [3] http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.00418: [4] http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.01268:
Liars Liars Liars Cowards Cowards Cowards
And yet the documentary's success in being selected for Cannes has resulted in Pathé buying up distribution rights to exhibit The Power of Nightmares in cinemas around the world. "They think there's a massive market for this." As a result, there is every possibility that his film will be shown in American cinemas, though Curtis worries that it will as a result become marginalised to art houses. As with the Channel 4 drama Yasmin about a Muslim Yorkshirewoman's travails in post 9/11 Britain, it seems important that the topical Power of Nightmares be seen by as many people as possible rather than savoured by a relatively small number of aesthetes in indie houses. "I work in TV because it's a more powerful medium and it reaches more people. It would be good for it to be shown on American TV, though they might think it's a bit dull to stimulate discussion. Are they too frightened to have the debate?"
Curtis argues that there is a huge appetite for a serious critical analysis of the post-9/11 geopolitical world in the US. "It has been shown at the Tribeca and San Francisco film festivals. All the shows were sold out. There were queues around the block, and the discussions were extraordinary. Sometimes I would just sit back and let the audiences discuss it. But I was quite shocked that the audiences, very well-educated people mostly, did not know about Qutb, whose thinking, which was developed under torture in Egyptian jails, was a direct influence on Zawahiri, al-Qaida's number two. " [...]
How will al-Jazeera's audience respond to the uncut version tonight? "No idea."[...]
· The Power of Nightmares will be shown in three-hour form on al-Jazeera tonight, and at Cannes on Saturday. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Film/cannes2005/story/0,15927,1481970,00.html The mostly dreadful interview cut out to save your eyes.Wednesday, May 11, 2005
World Without Parasites
Holy Joe
Downsize DC
Breaking the tightening grip
Pure unadulterated evil
Tuesday, May 10, 2005
Monday, May 09, 2005
Real ID Resistance
Papers, Please!
Real ID = National ID Card
This Tuesday, the US Senate is scheduled to vote on the implementation of a national ID card system. The Real ID Act is nothing less than a Real National ID Act. The only thing left to the individual states is to decide which pretty picture they will choose to put on the card: everything else will be controlled by Washington DC bureaucrats.
The Real ID Act has never been debated on the US Senate floor. They've never talked about it in any committee. Heck, most of them haven't even read it! Yet they're planning to vote on it on Tuesday, no questions asked.
In order to make a single irresponsible Congressman with totalitarian leanings happy, the Senate leadership let him write the bill and then slipped it into a another bill, one that would keep our fighting men and women taken care of in Iraq and Afghanistan. Supporting our troops means making sure they come home to a free nation, not a surveillance state.
Now you see!
Sunday, May 08, 2005
VE Day
Friday, May 06, 2005
Time Travellers Convention
- News of the convention did not survive into the era of Time Travel.
- News did survive into the era of Time Travel, but no one wants to attend.
- Time Travel was/is never invented.
- Time Travel is 'not possible'.
- Time Travellers attend, but in timelines other than ours.
- Time Travellers attend but no one knows it.
- Your suggestion here.