I am not bullshitting. This is for real. An appalling nightmare made real. There is no need for this, it is being done soley to fleece the eitire european population one face at a time, and then to control all europeans with this massive database. They will use this for absolutely everything, and it will control you from the day you are born to the day you die...if you consent to it. Even if "enrolment" is mandatory, the word mandatory is only real if the majority of people accept the new regulations. If they do not, the system will become "unworkable" which is doublespeak for "they wont buy it", which is market speak for "that dog wont hunt" which is southern speak for "back to the drawing board boys".
I will not enroll for this. No one that I know personally will enroll for this. This time the EU has gone too far.
Wednesday, February 25, 2004
I am not bullshitting. This is for real. An appalling nightmare made real. There is no need for this, it is being done soley to fleece the eitire european population one face at a time, and then to control all europeans with this massive database. They will use this for absolutely everything, and it will control you from the day you are born to the day you die...if you consent to it. Even if "enrolment" is mandatory, the word mandatory is only real if the majority of people accept the new regulations. If they do not, the system will become "unworkable" which is doublespeak for "they wont buy it", which is market speak for "that dog wont hunt" which is southern speak for "back to the drawing board boys".
I will not enroll for this. No one that I know personally will enroll for this. This time the EU has gone too far.
Animal control officers spent almost an hour trying to pull a pup from a storm drain pipe in Syracuse this week.
Kids walking down a sidewalk spotted the golden retriever in the storm drain, and rushed home to tell their parents who called police.
Three Davis County Animal Care and Control officers responded and tried to get to the dog, but he got spooked and crawled into the drain's pipe.
It took the officers about 45 minutes to rescue the lucky pup, and when they did, they were all covered in mud. The dog had no collar or tags and police think the dog's owner abandoned it.
The dog is doing fine and is staying at an animal shelter in Fruit Heights.
TETHL (There ends the hard link).
A DRUG addict who repeatedly pleaded to be committed to hospital because demons ordered him to do ?bad things? pushed a commuter under a Tube train, the Old Bailey was told yesterday.
Christophe Duclos was left slumped on the tracks with a severed left arm and broken bones after he was sent flying into the path of a fast-moving Underground train during rush hour. A Frenchman who had worked in Britain for six years, he died in hospital three days later.
Just hours before Stephen Soans-Wade, 36, pushed M Duclos on to the tracks he had told police he was hearing voices in his head, the court was told. He was taken to hospital but left before doctors were able to assess him. He had a history of trying to get himself sectioned under the Mental Health Act and was known for becoming violent when discharged because doctors found that he was not mad, it was alleged. [...]
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,4484-974456,00.html
A man down a big drain pushes a man onto the tracks. In New York during the late 70s 80s street wisdom dictated that you never stood close to the platform edge, because of "pushers". I loved the bizarre criminals that you used to get in the Big Apple; for example, "Dart Man" who used to stalk women and fire hand crafted darts into their asses with a blowpipe. Only in America, and especially only in New York. How we laughed at the continual parade of bizarre criminals dunderheads and pranksters lined up by WABC night after night, people who seemingly had not a single brain-cell between their ears. Dart Man was all over the papers; every time he struck another victim the news went wild. What a life; so tranquil that a single prankster could take over the entire city's imagination for weeks. Not so now of course.... As for Mr. Soans-Wade, the demon obeying underground pusher - he will certainly get what he wanted, and be "Sectioned".
Tuesday, February 24, 2004
Why Leaders Fail. A synopsis for you:
Inability to organize details: Efficient leadership calls for ability to organize and master details. No genuine leader is ever "too busy" to do anything which may be required in the capacity as a leader. When a person admits that they are "too busy", they admit inefficiency.
Unwillingness to render humble service Truly great leaders are willing, when occasion demands, to perform any sort of labour which they would ask another to perform.
Expectation of pay for what they "know" instead of what they do with what they know The world pays people for what they do, or induce others to do.
Fear of competition from followers The able leader trains their understudies to delegate, at will, any of the details of their positon. Only in this way may a leader multiply themselves and prepare to be at many places, and give attention to many things at one time.
Lack of imagination Without imagination, the leader is incapable of meeting emergencies, and of creating plans by which to guide followers efficiently.
Selfishness The leader who claims all the honor for the work of the followers is sure to be met by resentment. The really great leader claims none of the honors.
Intemperance Followers do not respect an intemperant leader. Moreover, intemperance, in any of its various forms, destroys the endurance and the virtality of all who indulge in it.
Disloyalty Disloyalty marks one as being less than the dust of the earth, and brings down on one's head the contempt one deserves. Lack of loyalty is one of the major causes of failure in every walk of life.
Emphasis on the "authority" of leadership The efficient leader leads by encouraging, not trying to instill fear in the hearts of followers. If a leader is a real leader, they will have no need to advertise that fact except by conduct - sympathy, understanding, fairness, and a demonstration that they know the job.
Emphasis of title The person who makes too much over their title generally has little else to emphasize. The doors to the office of the real leader are open to all who wish to enter, and their working quarters are free from formality or ostentation.
This imbecile, this edge to edge ego monster, this selfish ignorant and useless FOOL is going to make sure that the next election (not that they really matter, its the principle of selfishness that I am talking about) goes to The Enemy™.
There is no reason, no excuse, no logic that can explain, tidy up or justify why the vote should be split. The next election is so important, so crucial to the peace of this planet that all other concerns need to be put aside. Rather like the Roman Empire under an insane man, even though the emperor rules by divine right, it became necessary for moral and honourable men, sometimes friends, to murder him in order that people can be free. In his case, all everyone has to do is simply put aside their differences, which are small when weighed against the destruction of the country itself, so that the nearest polar opposite candidate (one with a brain) can be elected.
Democracy is broken. The incoming president and cabinet might do bad things, like Dean would certainly have done had he been elected. This is largely irrelevant. When you are getting rid of the worst president in American history, literally, anyone is a better choice. This must be the overriding concern; how to get rid of the current administration, and by extension, all the pure evil advisors, hangers on, special interst leeches and sheep shear weilding corporations that have totally corrupted the USA.
Anyone who understands this, and who has a love for that country would NEVER run for president, knowing that it could make the difference between the end of the country as we have loved it, and a change of direction back to the true America. Ralph Nader is insane. Or selfish. Or stupid. Or all three. Either way, anyone who cannot put his own interests aside for the good of his country should not be president. Ever.
Monday, February 23, 2004
This is the face that gets the tabloids in a frenzy, but what will drive them even more mad is the day that will inevitably come, where you cannot do anything ordinary in the English language. Already, in places like California, 50% of the population list Spanish as their mother tounge. You need to know some Spanish to be able to live. That isnt a bad thing - if you are not a foam mouthed Sun reader - but if you are, it represents a fundamental destruction of your way of life. Get used to it, because every european language is coming here, everything British is going to be owned by rich capable Europeans, like Chelski Football club, and Harrods. Its almost as if the previous governments didnt think the whole European integration process through to its logical conclusion; and in particular, this government, at the 11th hour, is trying to put a bandaid over the self inflicted shotgun wound of the EU. Its insane, stupid, ill concieved and totally nutz.
The only way out of this problem is to leave the EU while it is still possible; before the pound is given up for the Euro. This way, Shengen can be thrown out, and the UK will not have to follow EU regulations at all. The alternative is to stay in the EU, allow anyone in, and see the UK completely absorbed into Europe. I have no problem living next door to people, but i'll be damned if I let them tell me when I take a bath, and what soap I wah with. If any. Yes, "Wah!"
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:25:25 -0500 From: Bonnie Sunday, February 22, 2004
You're Canada!
People make fun of you a lot, but they're stupid because you've
got a much better life than they do. In fact, they're probably just jealous.
You believe in crazy things like human rights and health care and not
dying in the streets, and you end up securing these rights for yourself and
others. If it weren't for your weird affection for ice hockey, you'd be
the perfect person.
Take
the Country Quiz at the Blue Pyramid
Scientists Discover Methane Ice Worms on Gulf of Mexico Sea Floor
A team of university scientists using a mini research submarine on a NOAA-funded research cruise has discovered, photographed, and sampled what appears to be a new species of centipede-like worms living on and within mounds of methane ice on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico, about 150 miles south of New Orleans.
Although scientists had hypothesized that bacteria might colonize methane ice mounds, called gas hydrates, this is the first time animals have been found living in the mounds.
The discovery of dense colonies of these one-to-two-inch-long, flat, pinkish worms burrowing into a mushroom-shaped mound of methane seeping up from the sea floor raises speculation that the worms may be a new species with a pervasive and as yet unknown influence on these energy-rich gas deposits. [...]
http://www.science.psu.edu/alert/iceworms.htm
Is there any evidence the vaccine can harm a healthy child? There is no published evidence showing any increased risk or any explanation as to why a triple vaccine should be any more toxic than the same dose delivered singly.Just because there is no publishe evidence, this doesnt mean that the effect isnt real. Later on in this Q&A the effects of the triple vaccination are outlined. Your child could get the mild symtpoms of Rubella Mumps and Measles ALL AT THE SAME TIME, instead of ONE AT A TIME, if they were given the single vaccinations. Even the lowest simpleton on the planet can see that to administer an injection where there are three possible simultaneous side effects layered on each other cannot possibly be a sensible thing to do
Why has the Government banned single vaccines? Children would have to have six injections instead of two, increasing the risk of non-compliance. They would also risk catching one of the diseases while they wait to complete the course. The ban has let private clinics flourish, charging up to ?300 for the three vaccines.These vaccinations are not a legal requirement, and so the "risk of non compliance" is not a reason to "ban" single vaccines. They are just trying to be "efficient". Did Tony Bliar give his son the MMR injection; this is what we want to know. During the Mad Cow Disease scare, ministers went out and ate hamburgers in public. Do as I say and not as I do just doesnt cut it. To say that they would risk catching one of the three diseases is absurd; later in the same piece she talks about herd immunity protecting the population. As long as you take your three injections in a timely manner, this herd immunity should be preserved, and the danger of stacked side effects would be eliminated. Of course this means more WORK for the lazy people who are administering these injections, and of course, the leisuire of health workers is FAR more important than the health of the population. As for the ban letting private clinics flourish, this is just pathetic sour grapes bullshit that has nothing to do with the health of individuals. I do see however, that many of these clinics are using google adwords to sell their services - thanks Jane!
What is my child's risk of catching measles if he or she doesn't have the jab? Provided there is reasonable 'herd immunity', the risk of a non-vaccinated child catching measles is very low - that is why vaccination is regarded as a social responsibility. It is only where herd immunity breaks down that measles epidemics become more likely.That last blockquote was FYI.
Are there any side-effects to the vaccine?Between a week and 10 days after the MMR immunisation, some children become feverish, develop a measles-like rash and go off their food. About three weeks after the injection a child might occasionally develop a mild form of mumps. A few children get a rash of small bruise-like spots due to the rubella part after about two weeks. About one in 1,000 will have a fit after becoming feverish - although there are no long-term consequences.So you say, "woman with no past". Its abundantly clear. Any sensible person reading the above "facts" would instantly choose either single vaccinations or abstention because getting three separate doses is prohibitively expensive. Herd immunity can protect your child, and you dont take the risk of your precious offspring being turned into a sufferer of autistism, which is a much more horrible fate than catching a case of the Mumps or Measles, which untill vaccinations came along, the older people I know say were treated like chicken pox; you got it, and then got over it. Of course, there is now a chicken pox vaccine; how long berore that is dumped into this coctail so that we have MMRC? Maybe geeks will be coerced to take it if they put the influenza vaccine in instead of Mumps, giving us MIRC. Dr. Wakefield may or may not have been biased. He is unusual in that he is biased against the medical status quo, which probably was taken as his greatest crime. When these shepherds take money from Pharmaceutical companies (and there are plenty more that do that than the lone voices like Wakefield), where are the full page articles by "journalists" with no bacground to knock them down in public? By the stacked side effects alone, MMR doesnt make sense. Then there is the alledged autism side effect. If you have a child and you think this is a risk worth taking, even when Bliar himself wont give it to his son, then do so; its ultimately your personal business. What is completely wrong, is that only the rich have this choice, when it should be available to everyone. That is the core issue, who makes the decision to vaccinate the herd in a way that is designed to save money, in fact whose primary aim is to save money? You cannot say taht the health of the herd is the primary motivation, since the risk of side effects are tripled. Who is the woman that made this cost saving proposal, and even more importantly, which company offered it, what are they making out of it - these are the important facts, since everyone save the rich is being corralled into taking this poison.
You're Switzerland!
While most people think you're sort of stuck up, it's really
just that people don't interest you that much. That's why you'd rather
just stay out of everything and be as neutral as possible. Somewhere in
there is an ability to be a psychiatrist because you're so objective, but you
might just be too cold for that.
Take
the Country Quiz at the Blue Pyramid
You're France!
Most people think you're snobby, but it's really just that
you're better than everyone else. At least you're more loyal to the real
language, the fine arts, and the fine wines than anyone else. You aren't
worth beans in a fight, unless you're really short, but you're so good at other
things that it usually doesn't matter. Some of your finest works were
intended to be short-term projects.
Take the Country Quiz
at the Blue Pyramid
Saturday, February 21, 2004
each post must follow on from the last lines of the previous post, each post must be at least 250 words long, each post must have a picture, no consecutive posts from the same poster.Can you handle it?
Friday, February 20, 2004
Microsoft today released a critical update to remove "unacceptable symbols" from Bookshelf Symbol 7 font.
Just 58-odd years after the Red Army hoisted its standard on the roof of the Reichstag on 30 April 1945, effectively ending the European war, MS has finally flushed the swastika from its last hiding place - an otherwise innocent font shipped with Office 2003. [...]
???!!!
Toward Universal Surveillance
Last month the Supreme Court let stand the Justice Department's right to secretly arrest non-citizen residents. Combined with the government's power to designate foreign prisoners of war as "enemy combatants" in order to ignore international treaties regulating their incarceration, and their power to indefinitely detain U.S. citizens without charge or access to an attorney, the United States is looking more and more like a police state. Since 9/11, the Justice Department has asked for, and largely received, additional powers that allow it to perform an unprecedented amount of surveillance of American citizens and visitors. The USA PATRIOT Act, passed in haste after 9/11, started the ball rolling. In December, a provision slipped into an appropriations bill allowing the FBI to obtain personal financial information from banks, insurance companies, travel agencies, real estate agents, stockbrokers, the U.S. Postal Service, jewelry stores, casinos, and car dealerships without a warrant -- because they're all construed as financial institutions. Starting this year, the U.S. government is photographing and fingerprinting foreign visitors into this country from all but 27 other countries. The litany continues. CAPPS-II, the government's vast computerized system for probing the backgrounds of all passengers boarding flights, will be fielded this year. Total Information Awareness, a program that would link diverse databases and allow the FBI to collate information on all Americans, was halted at the federal level after a huge public outcry, but is continuing at a state level with federal funding. Over New Year's, the FBI collected the names of 260,000 people staying at Las Vegas hotels. More and more, at every level of society, the "Big Brother is Watching You" style of total surveillance is slowly becoming a reality. Security is a trade off. It makes no sense to ask whether a particular security system is effective or not -- otherwise you'd all be wearing bulletproof vests and staying immured in your home. The proper question to ask is whether the trade-off is worth it. Is the level of security gained worth the costs, whether in money, in liberties, in privacy, or in convenience? This is a personal decision, and one greatly influenced by the situation. For most of us, bulletproof vests are not worth the cost and inconvenience. For some of us, home burglar alarm systems are. And most of us lock our doors at night. Terrorism is no different. We need to weigh each security countermeasure. Is the additional security against the risks worth the costs? Are there smarter things we can be spending our money on? How does the risk of terrorism compare with the risks in other aspects of our lives: automobile accidents, domestic violence, industrial pollution, and so on? Are there costs that are just too expensive for us to bear? Unfortunately, it's rare to hear this level of informed debate. Few people remind us how minor the terrorist threat really is. Rarely do we discuss how little identification has to do with security, and how broad surveillance of everyone doesn't really prevent terrorism. And where's the debate about what's more important: the freedoms and liberties that have made America great or some temporary security? Instead, the DOJ (fueled by a strong police mentality inside the Administration) is directing our nation's political changes in response to 9/11. And it's making trade-offs from its own subjective perspective: trade-offs that benefit it even if they are to the detriment of others. From the point of view of the DOJ, judicial oversight is unnecessary and unwarranted; doing away with it is a better trade off. They think collecting information on everyone is a good idea, because they are less concerned with the loss of privacy and liberty. Expensive surveillance and data mining systems are a good trade-off for them because more budget means even more power. And from their perspective, secrecy is better than openness; if the police are absolutely trustworthy, then there's nothing to be gained from a public process. If you put the police in charge of security, the trade-offs they make result in measures that resemble a police state. This is wrong. The trade-offs are larger than the FBI or the DOJ. Just as a company would never put a single department in charge of its own budget, someone above the narrow perspective of the DOJ needs to be balancing the country's needs and making decisions about these security trade-offs. The laws limiting police power were put in place to protect us from police abuse. Privacy protects us from threats by government, corporations, and individuals. And the greatest strength of our nation comes from our freedoms, our openness, our liberties, and our system of justice. Ben Franklin once said: "Those who would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Since 9/11 Americans have squandered an enormous amount of liberty, and we didn't even get any temporary safety in return. by Bruce Schneier This essay originally appeared on CNet: http://news.com.com/2010-1028-5150325.htmlH5N1 vaccine strain in a week
Using reverse genetics, WHO thinks a prototype bird flu strain likely to be ready in a week | By Robert Walgate GENEVA?A prototype vaccine strain of the H5N1 flu virus causing havoc in Asia will probably be ready next week, John Wood of the UK National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) told The Scientist today (January 29). However, months of other hurdles remain before it may be ready for public health use. As leaders of the countries worst hit by the avian flu met in Bangkok at an emergency summit on Wednesday (January 28), World Health Organization (WHO) labs were working to formulate a vaccine against the virus. The H5N1 virus kills chicken eggs, the normal medium for growing flu vaccine viruses, so the WHO laboratories are using reverse genetics to lower the pathogenicity of the virus to chickens and to get a high yield in the egg cultures, said Klaus St?hr, project leader of the influenza surveillance and scientific groups for the H5N1 outbreak team. Reverse genetics also cuts down the normal time required for flu vaccine production. [...] http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040129/05
Mr Skolnick is the second US national to be fined for "disrespecting police" since Brazil began photographing and fingerprinting US citizens in January. [...]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3470383.stm
Thursday, February 19, 2004
| INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population. |
| ESFP - "Entertainer". Radiates attractive warmth and optimism. Smooth, witty, charming, clever. Fun to be with. Very generous. 8.5% of the total population. |
The government's suggestion that it may offer a compromise of allowing GM-free zones will also be of interest to the more than 40 regions, including Cornwall, Devon, Somerset and the Lake District national parks authority, which have made moves to declare themselves GM free.Pollen carrying insects make this idea unworkable. The only way you could ensure that an area was "GM Free" would be to put it in a hermitically sealed dome, cut off from the rest of the environment. That is "not going to happen". Only a very stupid person would sanction an irrevocable act like allowing the mass cultivation of GM crops. Ah yes, "the explanation". The leaked documents also reveal that the government has not yet given up hope of swinging the public round in favour of the crops. "Opposition might eventually be worn down by solid, authoritative scientific argument." Worn down. Not swung, but worn down. Anyone who supports these people is insane.
Wednesday, February 18, 2004

You're Gangsta Bitch Barbie. You're tough and you
like it rough, and of course you like to pop a
cap in any wiggers ass.
If You Were A Barbie, Which Messed Up Version Would You Be?
brought to you by Quizilla You better not step to these, REAL motherfucking Gs!
Tuesday, February 17, 2004
Monday, February 16, 2004
Dont you wish that Spirit had a simple crowbar so that it could filp over some of these rocks? Thats where all the bugs live!
Sunday, February 15, 2004
Saturday, February 14, 2004
On February 9, 2004, the Local 802 Chapter of the American Federation of Musicians announced what they described as an "historic joint agreement ... banning the use of the virtual orchestra machine (sic)" in all future productions of the Opera Company of Brooklyn" [...]
http://www.rms.biz/docs/press%20release.htm
nka Essenhigh (American, born 1970).
Deluge, 1998.
Oil enamel on canvas, 72 x 72" (182.9 x 182.9 cm.).
Collection Albright-Knox Art Gallery.
Sarah Norton Goodyear Fund, 1998.
In an age of satellite TV, the Internet, and global positioning systems, even artistic media are increasingly giving way to the high-tech. In this epoch, what is the role of painting? [...]
http://www.albrightknox.org/acquisitions/acq_2000/Essenhigh.html
Diggers.
Wiggers.
Irizzos.
who knows what will happen?!
Why dont you simply
I tried to search for this with google.....This is the faked photo of Kerry and "Hanoi" Jane Fonda, created by a dirty tricks office somewhere.
See / get it and others by Paul Griffiths 



